Crystallography: Difference between revisions

From CCP4 wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 76: Line 76:


== Teaching crystallography ==
== Teaching crystallography ==
* [[Crystallography courses on the web]]
=== [[Crystallography courses on the web]] ===
* [[Crystallography books]]
=== [[Crystallography books]] ===
* [[Test data sets]]
=== [[Test data sets]] ===
* Slides showing the effect of resolution on electron density [http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~emsley/coot/slides/reso-slides/]
=== Slides showing the effect of resolution on electron density [http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~emsley/coot/slides/reso-slides/] ===


== Understanding and extending the properties and limitations of crystallographic computations ==
== Understanding and extending the properties and limitations of crystallographic computations ==

Revision as of 10:23, 30 October 2010

Crystallographic Theory

Crystallography Software

For Specific Tasks

Automated Pipelines for Structure Solution

Web services

Software Packages

(large packages first)

Libraries for crystallography and related areas

Tricks and Tips

Teaching crystallography

Crystallography courses on the web

Crystallography books

Test data sets

Slides showing the effect of resolution on electron density [3]

Understanding and extending the properties and limitations of crystallographic computations

Ensemble refinement, and molecular dynamics

  1. Direct Observation of Protein Solvation and Discrete Disorder with Experimental Crystallographic Phases. Burling FT, Weis WI, Flaherty KM, Brünger AT. Science (1996) 271, 72-77 [4]
  2. Heterogeneity and Inaccuracy in Protein Structures Solved by X-Ray Crystallography. DePristo MA,de Bakker PIW, Blundell TL (2004) Structure 12, 831-838 [5]
  3. Ensemble Refinement of Protein Crystal Structures: Validation and Application. Levin EJ, Kondrashov DA, Wesenberg GE, Phillips GN, Structure 15, 1040 - 1052 [6]
  4. A comparison between molecular dynamics and X-ray results for dissociated CO in myoglobin. Vitkup D, Petsko GA, Karplus M. Nature Structural Biology 4, 202 - 208 (1997) [7] (Vitkup et al showed that fitting a single model to MD-simulation derived "data" gave ~20% R, which means multiple conformers are sufficient to explain the "R-Factor Gap" between the 20% usually obtained for macromolecules, and the 5% routinely obtained for small molecules)

Electron microscopy and X-ray

  1. Elucidating the medium-resolution structure of ribosomal particles: an interplay between electron cryo-microscopy and X-ray crystallography. Harms J, Tocilj A, Levin I, Agmon I, Stark H, Kölln I, van Heel M, Cuff M, Schlünzen F, Bashan A, Franceschi F, Yonath A. Structure 7, 931-941 (1999) [8]

NMR versus X-ray

A couple of papers analysing and comparing NMR and X-ray methods/structures:

  1. Combining experimental information from crystal and solution studies: joint X-ray and NMR refinement. Shaanan B, Gronenborn AM, Cohen GH, Gilliland GL, Veerapandian B, Davies DR, Clore GM. Science (1992), 257, 961 [9]
  2. X-ray Crystallography and NMR: Complementary Views of Structure and Dynamics, Nature Structural Biology 4, 862-865 (1997). Preprint available from Axel Brunger's "publications" website.
  3. Traditional Biomolecular Structure Determination by NMR Spectroscopy Allows for Major Errors. S.B. Nabuurs, C.A.E.M. Spronk, G.W. Vuister, G. Vriend. PLoS Comput Biol 2(2): e9. [10]