Known Bugs: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
16 bytes removed ,  10 September 2008
m
no edit summary
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
* The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007 version, and versions since December 2007 do.
* The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007 version, and versions since December 2007 do.
* The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a compiler bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. Example taken from CORRECT.LP produced with xds_par:
* The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. Example taken from CORRECT.LP produced with xds_par:
  CORRELATION  NPAIR  Rmeas  COMPARED  ESD      REINDEX TRANSFORMATION
  CORRELATION  NPAIR  Rmeas  COMPARED  ESD      REINDEX TRANSFORMATION
   
   
Line 9: Line 9:
   
   
   *  0.89    5960  25.1  53803    1.65  1  0  0  0  0  1  0  0  0  0  1  0
   *  0.89    5960  25.1  53803    1.65  1  0  0  0  0  1  0  0  0  0  1  0
       0.06    5960  25.1  53803    1.65  1  1  0  0 -1  0  0  0  0  0  1  
       0.06    5960  25.1  53803    1.65  1  1  0  0 -1  0  0  0  0  0  1 0
The workaround is to use the single-processor version ("xds") instead.
The problem is fixed in XDS versions starting September 2008.
2,684

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu