Known Bugs: Difference between revisions

Known Bugs (view source)

21 bytes added , 10 September 2008

no edit summary

2,684

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 * The October 2007 and the November 2007 versions do not evaluate DATA_RANGE= in the CORRECT step. The August 2007 version, and versions since December 2007 do.
-* The June and July 2008 versions of "xds_par" under Linux suffer from a bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. Example taken from CORRECT.LP produced with xds_par:
+* The June and July 2008 versions suffer from a bug in the CORRECT step: the correlation coefficient against a reference data set is always 0.00, and therefore sometimes the wrong decision is made concerning re-indexing of the data. Example taken from CORRECT.LP produced with xds_par:
   CORRELATION  NPAIR  Rmeas  COMPARED  ESD       REINDEX TRANSFORMATION
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
    *   0.89     5960   25.1   53803    1.65  1  0  0  0  0  1  0  0  0  0  1  0
 .06     5960   25.1   53803    1.65  1  1  0  0 -1  0  0  0  0  0  1  0
-The problem is fixed in XDS versions starting September 2008.
+For me, xds_par produced the problem, but not xds.
+This is fixed in XDS versions starting September 2008.